The Blog of the Coalition for Secular Government

Monday, September 22, 2008 Fertilized Eggs Are Still Not Persons By Diana Hsieh @ 12:01 AM Good news from the ACLU's blog: Score a victory for reproductive justice in the Illinois Appellate Court on Friday! Ruling that an unimplanted, fertilized egg is not a "human being" for purposes of a wrongful death action, the Illinois Appellate Court today reversed a 2005 decision by a Cook County Judge. The decision is a victory for scientific sanity and access to reproductive health care. Had the lower court's decision been allowed to stand, the ability of women to make personal decisions about birth control, abortion, genetic testing and pregnancy would have been put in jeopardy. The case involved an Illinois couple suing their fertility clinic for tens of thousands of dollars because the clinic inadvertently had destroyed unimplanted eggs stored at the facility. The lower court had accepted the argument that a human being is created when an egg is fertilized, regardless of whether the fertilized egg is implanted in a woman's body or left in a Petri dish. Left undisturbed, the lower court's decision could have limited the ability of women in Illinois to access contraceptive services and genetic testing. Moreover, the decision would curb the ability of couples in Illinois to use reproductive technologies, such as in vitro fertilization, in starting a family. (That's just the beginning of the post. If you're interested, you can read the whole thing. Unfortunately, Colorado faces the same threat with Amendment 48 -- the ballot measure that would grant full legal rights to fertilized eggs. To understand the insane legal implications of that measure -- and the faith-based fictions on which it's built -- read CSG's issue paper, written by Ari Armstrong and myself: Amendment 48 Is Anti-Life: Why It Matters That a Fertilized Egg Is Not a Person. Labels: Abortion, Amendment 48 E-mail Diana Hsieh    PermaLink ()    Comments

Comments on "Fertilized Eggs Are Still Not Persons"

Sunday, September 28, 2008 at 12:18:53 mst Comment ID: #1 Name: z E-mail: shekfu(at)hotmail.com Heres what I don't get. Life. Life starts at conception. Then why is it ok to walk on LIVING grass? Why is it not against the law to step on a LIVING ant? Why is it not a crime to KILL a cow and eat it? If life is the standard of rights, then all these things would be illegal. So its obvious that life does not equal rights. The question is not "When does life begin?" It should be "When do rights begin?" On the other hand, I'd still say that life does not start at conception anyhow because at that point, whatever it is, it is still a being which is being built by another being. It is not until the bodily processes are all or at least primarily those of the being itself does it deserve rights. Before a heart forms, a brain, a nervous system, etc, there should be no question that whatever it is, it is not a human being with rights.

Post Your Comment on "Fertilized Eggs Are Still Not Persons"

Name or Handle: E-mail: URL:   Remember Me   Comment:   No HTML is allowed. URLs will be automatically converted into clickable links. Commenters are welcome to clearly state their own views, as well as to criticize opposing views and arguments. Personal attacks are not welcome. To prevent spam comments: 8 plus 7 equals 8550276749755172475