The Blog of the Coalition for Secular Government

Monday, December 7, 2009

Religious Right Takes a Deep Philosophical Breath
By Gina Liggett @ 10:00 AM PermaLink

For two decades, the Religious Right has reveled in the successes of their crusade to erode the wall separating church and state. Since America's sharp Left turn in 2008, they have not been so quick to gloat. Dr. James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family, said, "I'm not grieving over Barack Obama's victory, but over the loss of things that I've fought for, for 35 years," particularly concerning abortion rights and advancement of the so-called homosexual agenda. The Religious Right itself seems to be taking a soul-searching sabbatical, to get back in touch with its deeper mission: to live by the rule of God.

In October over 500 evangelical Christian leaders attended a conference at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary on "renewing the evangelical mission." Many felt that evangelicals had veered from the mission of Jesus. As one pastor put it: "The missing ingredient is not the primacy of the mind and doctrine. It's the willingness to suffer."

To this point, attendees sang a hymn with the words, "We spurned God's way and sought our own, and so have become worthless." I'm not sure if in this context "worthlessness" pertains to human beings or to evangelism's usefulness to society. Indeed, one pastor lamented, "We've become useless in a society that desperately needs us."

Another theologian urged pastors to talk less about fulfilling individual potential and teach more from Old Testament prophets like Prophet Joel, who urged repentance before God. Others argued for embracing Christian Reconstructionism, a movement emphasizing the total reformation of society according to God's Law. Yet another pastor, spoke of his frustration in getting evangelicals of differing perspectives to collaborate on goals such as fighting abortion rights.

But in the end, all conferees agreed that Scripture should be the foundation for whatever direction Christianity is to take.

In a well-publicized coming-together, another prominent group of Catholic and Protestant leaders announced in November their joint document called The Manhattan Declaration: a Call of Christian Conscience. It states:
We are Orthodox, Catholic, and evangelical Christians who have united at this hour to reaffirm fundamental truths about justice and the common good and to call upon our fellow citizens...to join us in defending them. These truths are: the sanctity of human life; the dignity of marriage as the conjugal union of husband and wife; the rights of conscience and religious liberty.....We make this commitment not as partisans of any political group but as followers of Jesus Christ, the crucified and risen Lord, who is the Way, the Truth, and the Life.
As defenders of Christianity's 2000-year-old legacy of "proclaiming God's word," they claim that it because of Christian "obedience to the one true God...who has laid total claim on our lives..." that the moral good has manifested in society (e.g., babies being rescued from ancient Roman trash heaps, and the emergence of modern democracy).

It is in this spirit that the Christian leaders have drawn their philosophical line in the sand:
(W)e will not comply with any edict that purports to compel our institutions to participate in abortions, embryo-destructive research, assisted suicide and euthanasia, or any other anti-life act; nor will we bend to any rule purporting to force us to bless immoral sexual partnerships, treat them as marriages or the equivalent, or refrain from proclaiming the truth, as we know it, about morality and immorality and marriage and the family. We will fully and ungrudgingly render to Caesar what is Caesar's. But under no circumstances will we render to Caesar what is God's.
These two events, the writing of the Manhattan Declaration and the Gordon-Conwell conference, have made it clear that the Religious Right is getting back to its philosophical roots: that truth and human society should be "grounded in Holy Scripture."

Contrast this with Ayn Rand's philosophy of Objectivism. Ayn Rand integrated the inescapable axiom that "existence exists" with the fact that humans rely on their faculty of reason to survive, validating that the moral good is the pursuit of human life-enhancing values.

In direct opposition are the Christian beliefs of a dual universe consisting of a mystical God ruling over humans, the reliance on Scripture as the source of truth, and self-sacrificing service to God's laws as the moral good. These fundamentally irrational ideas are anti-life in the most profound sense of the term, and can lead only to tyranny.

The Christians are returning to their philosophical roots. It is time for rational individuals to follow the religious right's example of philosophical introspection. But let's become grounded in a philosophy that holds as absolute--not God--but reason, reality and rational egoism.

Labels: ,

E-mail Gina Liggett    PermaLink ()    Comments   
 
Comments on "Religious Right Takes a Deep Philosophical Breath"
Monday, December 14, 2009 at 15:35:10 mst
Comment ID: #1
Name: Ted Harlson
E-mail: MelTed1967(at)hotmail.com


The religeous are going back to their non-sensical doctrines. They can't compete with reason so are going back to unreason - the unprovable. They've been beaten by politics and have proven to not be able to compete in the real world.

I pity the children of the world now as religeon will exert its full irrationalism on them. Those creeds are the broadest backdrop that I think undermine young minds. Some young children may resist, but most eventually succumb in their later years to "God" in some form if they haven't found a philosophy. Even those who do find a philosophy, the damage and wreckage in the meantime is immense: Lost time that can never be returned for self development and growth.

I'm glad that, in this period of living, Ayn Rand had spoken up and spoken out.

Ted Harlson.


Tuesday, December 15, 2009 at 6:35:58 mst
Comment ID: #2
Name: Vincent Jappi
E-mail: vincent.jappi(at)gmail.com

Of course, one would give more credence to the alleged advocates of separating church from state if they fought government interference with other peoples' lives as such, and not only when it runs counter to their personal beliefs.

To the extent that they don't, and think nothing of government-funded education or government meddling with he definition of morality or marriage, their endeavors to ban Christianity there amount to the imposition of an alternative set of beliefs, which one is perfectly entitled to call another religion, since it is arbitrary and, indeed, irrational.

And to the extent that they try to impose that secular religion on an overwhelming majority of the citizens who believe otherwise, the project they are part of is a pseudo-elitist, authoritarian and anti-democratic one.


Post Your Comment on "Religious Right Takes a Deep Philosophical Breath"

Name or Handle:
E-mail:
URL:
 Remember Me
 
Comment:  
No HTML is allowed. URLs will be automatically converted into clickable links.

Commenters are welcome to clearly state their own views, as well as to criticize opposing views and arguments. Personal attacks are not welcome.

To prevent spam comments: 6 plus 5 equals 6962203325565377238


Home | Blog | E-mail Lists | Resources | E-mail CSG | About CSG